All content tagged with: University of Michigan Law School

Post List

• Book Reviews & Notices

  Leibholz: Politics and Law

  • Hugo J. Hahn
  • Published: January, 1966
  • Volume 64, Issue 3
• Book Reviews & Notices

  Recent Books

  • Michigan Law Review
  • Published: January, 1966
  • Volume 64, Issue 3
• Book Reviews & Notices

  Schur: Crimes Without Victims: Deviant Behavior and Public Policy

  • Mauris M. Platkin M.D.
  • Published: January, 1966
  • Volume 64, Issue 5
• Other

  Advertised Value of Trading Stamps Is Basis for State Sales Tax–Red Head Premium Co. v. Schneider

  • Michigan Law Review
  • Published: January, 1966
  • Volume 64, Issue 6
• Other

  Television Sponsor and Advertising Agency Held Vicariously Liable for Copyright Infringement–Davis v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.

  • Michigan Law Review
  • Published: January, 1966
  • Volume 64, Issue 6
• Book Reviews & Notices

  LaFave: Arrest: The decision To Take a Suspect Into Custody

  • B. J. George Jr.
  • Published: January, 1966
  • Volume 64, Issue 6
• Articles & Essays

  FTC v. Jantzen: Blessing, Disaster, or Tempest in a Teapot?

  • Thomas E. Kauper
  • Published: January, 1966
  • Volume 64, Issue 8
• Book Reviews & Notices

  Norris: A Casebook of Complete Criminal Trials

  • Otis J. Smith
  • Published: January, 1966
  • Volume 64, Issue 8
• Articles & Essays

  Foster Parents Versus Agencies: A Case Study in the Judicial Application of “The Best Interests of the Child” Doctrine

  • Sanford N. Katz
  • Published: January, 1966
  • Volume 65, Issue 1
• Other

  Future Interests–Implying a Requirement of Survival in Future Interests: Continued Confusion–Schau v. Cecil

  • Michigan Law Review
  • Published: January, 1966
  • Volume 65, Issue 1
• Other

  Labor Law–NLRB Refuses To Apply Related Work Doctrine to Construction Site Picketing–Building and Construction Trades Council (Markwell & Hartz)

  • Michigan Law Review
  • Published: January, 1966
  • Volume 65, Issue 1
• Other

  Labor Law-NRAB Awards in Work Assignment Disputes Are Unenforceable Unless the Board Has Considered the Interest of the Competing Union-Order of R.R. Telegraphers v. Union Pac. R.R.

  • Michigan Law Review
  • Published: January, 1966
  • Volume 65, Issue 2