In Print

Other
Television Sponsor and Advertising Agency Held Vicariously Liable for Copyright Infringement–Davis v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.
- Michigan Law Review
- Published: January, 1966
- Volume 64, Issue 6
Book Reviews & Notices
LaFave: Arrest: The decision To Take a Suspect Into Custody
- B. J. George Jr.
- Published: January, 1966
- Volume 64, Issue 6
Articles & Essays
FTC v. Jantzen: Blessing, Disaster, or Tempest in a Teapot?
- Thomas E. Kauper
- Published: January, 1966
- Volume 64, Issue 8
Book Reviews & Notices
Norris: A Casebook of Complete Criminal Trials
- Otis J. Smith
- Published: January, 1966
- Volume 64, Issue 8
Articles & Essays
Foster Parents Versus Agencies: A Case Study in the Judicial Application of “The Best Interests of the Child” Doctrine
- Sanford N. Katz
- Published: January, 1966
- Volume 65, Issue 1
Other
Future Interests–Implying a Requirement of Survival in Future Interests: Continued Confusion–Schau v. Cecil
- Michigan Law Review
- Published: January, 1966
- Volume 65, Issue 1
Other
Labor Law–NLRB Refuses To Apply Related Work Doctrine to Construction Site Picketing–Building and Construction Trades Council (Markwell & Hartz)
- Michigan Law Review
- Published: January, 1966
- Volume 65, Issue 1
Other
Labor Law-NRAB Awards in Work Assignment Disputes Are Unenforceable Unless the Board Has Considered the Interest of the Competing Union-Order of R.R. Telegraphers v. Union Pac. R.R.
- Michigan Law Review
- Published: January, 1966
- Volume 65, Issue 2
Other
Service of Process-Federal Rules of Civil Procedure-Service of Process in Italy on Alien Corporate Defendant Permitted in a Federal Antitrust Action-Hoffman Motors Corp. v. Alfa Romeo S.p.A..
- Michigan Law Review
- Published: January, 1966
- Volume 65, Issue 2
Book Reviews & Notices
Jacobson: Diplomats, Scientists, and Politicians: The United States and the Nuclear Test Ban Negotiations
- Bernard G. Bechhoefer
- Published: January, 1966
- Volume 65, Issue 2
Articles & Essays
The Purposes of Advocacy and the Limits of Confidentiality
- John T. Noonan Jr.
- Published: January, 1966
- Volume 64, Issue 8
Other
“Primarily for Sale” in I.R.C Sections 1221 and 1231 Held To Mean “Principally for Sale” Rather Than “Substantially for Sale” —Malat v. Riddell (U.S. 1966)
- Michigan Law Review
- Published: January, 1966
- Volume 64, Issue 8